By Charles Thomas-Stanford - Early editions of Euclid’s Elements, by Charles Thomas-Stanford. Plate X., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=144950
Based on his Wikipedia page, we don’t know a lot about
Euclid’s life. He is best known for his written work, The Elements, which is 13
books that build upon each other’s mathematical ideas. The Elements is largely
considered a compilation of mathematical ideas of Euclid’s time, with its
influence lying in its detailed structure and rigorous proofs.
My interpretation of the first poem is that the author holds
Euclid in very high esteem, largely due to his creation of what we know as geometry,
technically referred to as Euclidean geometry. This line in particular, “To
ponder on themselves, the while they stare At nothing, intricately drawn
nowhere In shapes of shifting lineage” implies to me that she is remarking on
his contributions to geometry.
I interpret the second poem as irreverent and satirical in
nature. It begins by calling into question that only Euclid has seen “Beauty
bare”, and invokes the modern marvel of the telephone. The second and third
verses chastises other poets who have claimed to see beauty bare for not being
honest that beauty was clothed, or did not exist. I’m not entirely clear on why
the author takes this tone, perhaps they don’t like the near deification of
ancient mathematicians. It’s certainly fair to assume that if Euclid had not
laid the foundations of geometry someone else would have.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_Elements
Good! A few things to note:
ReplyDelete•Euclidean geometry doesn't just mean 'geometry'! There are many non-Euclidean geometries including hyperbolic, spherical, finite, affine, projective and others.
•Good analysis of the differing tones of the two poems. The second one also takes a gentle nudge at poets (like the fabled Orpheus) and suggests that they also miss seeing 'Beauty bare'...